Most of my work starts the same way: understanding the structure behind a problem — the load paths in a component, the dependencies in a production line, the architecture of an organisation — before a single model gets built. Simulation and structural optimisation, using Abaqus, nonlinear FEM, and explicit methods, are how that understanding becomes a verified fix — whether that means redesigning a component or optimising the process around it.
Most simulation work stops where the software stops. The model runs, the results look plausible, the report gets written. But plausible isn't correct — and fast isn't thorough.
Every engagement follows the same discipline, regardless of scale: understand the reality in full, build the smallest model that answers the actual question, and validate against reality at every step — not as an afterthought, but as part of the method.
Engineering analysis identifies what's actually wrong, and what fixing it is worth. The services below build and verify the fix.
Structuring a complex technical or operational problem before anyone builds a solution to it — mapping the underlying dependencies in a mechanical system, a production process, or an organisation, isolating the actual root cause, and assessing what fixing it is worth. The starting point for engagements where the real problem isn't yet clearly defined.
Topology optimisation, parameter variation, and sensitivity analysis for structurally critical components, using Abaqus and ANSYS OptiSlang. Lightweight potential is quantified and documented. Applicable to automotive, aerospace, and medical device contexts. This is the area of deepest methodological expertise — results delivered at research and industry standard alike.
Validation of existing finite element models, development of custom material models, nonlinear structural analysis, and MATLAB-based analytical support. Differentiated by research-level understanding of nonlinear FEM formulations — not merely software operation, but the underlying mechanics. Ideal for clients who need theoretical rigour, not just results.
Full scenario modelling, simulation, post-processing, and optimisation recommendations for explicit FEM problems using LS-DYNA. Typical applications include crash and impact analysis, drop tests, forming and stamping processes, high-velocity contact, and blast or impulse loading. Methodology follows the standards applied in premium industrial development environments. Typical duration: 2–6 weeks.
Automated workflows for parameter studies, Abaqus scripting, result evaluation, and report generation. Reduces manual simulation effort significantly and makes parametric studies reproducible and scalable. Can be booked as a standalone project or as an add-on to any structural optimisation or FEM study — often the natural next step once a workflow is established.
What connects my work is less a single tool and more a habit: treat every problem — a bolted joint, a production line, a 70-person organisation — as something to be structured before it's solved.
I started Scheid Engineering Services to make high-quality simulation work directly accessible to the companies that need it — with the methods and standards of large development environments, and without the overhead that usually comes with them.
Alongside SES, I lead a 70+ member student consultancy as President — diagnosing a structural decline in the organisation's core consulting business and building the strategic and operational systems needed to reverse it.
My background spans three distinct areas of finite element simulation: explicit FEM applied commercially in a vehicle safety development environment, implicit structural optimisation developed through applied research at KIT, and analytically derived nonlinear FEM formulations from a DAAD-funded research stay in Italy. That combination — industrial practice, applied research, and theoretical rigour — rarely exists in a single profile.
I hold a B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from a dual study programme combining academic education with four years of applied industrial engineering. I am currently completing an M.Sc. at KIT, with soon a thesis on optimal control of underactuated discrete systems.
Member, Royal Aeronautical Society · Member, VDI · e-fellows.net Scholar.
The clearest starting point is a brief technical description of the problem — geometry, boundary conditions, loads, and what you need to understand from the simulation. A short conversation is usually enough to scope a project and agree on a timeline.
I typically respond within one business day. For time-sensitive requests, a phone call is faster.
Based in Karlsruhe, Germany. Available for remote and on-site engagements across the DACH region.